In July 2013, which significant ruling affected The Motor Voter Law?

The ruling in question from July 2013 is significant because it addressed states' abilities to impose additional requirements on voter registration processes. In the case involving Arizona, the Supreme Court determined that states cannot require proof of citizenship beyond what is stipulated in the National Voter Registration Act (often referred to as the Motor Voter Law). This decision reinforced the federal standard for voter registration and highlighted the balance between state and federal authority regarding voting rights.

The ruling established that while states have some power to regulate their own election processes, they must adhere to the federal guidelines set forth in the Motor Voter Law. This was a crucial moment for advocates of voting rights as it protected against states potentially imposing more restrictive registration requirements that could hinder access to voting. Therefore, the ruling affirmed that the federal requirements for voter registration could not be supplemented by more stringent state requirements, thus impacting the implementation of the Motor Voter Law significantly.