What was the significance of the Supreme Court case Evenwel v. Abbott (2016)?

The significance of the Supreme Court case Evenwel v. Abbott (2016) lies in its affirmation of the principle of "one person, one vote," which is foundational to electoral representation. The Court upheld the use of total population counts for redistricting purposes, meaning that when states draw their legislative districts, they must account for the total population, not just the voting-eligible population. This decision underscores the idea that representation should reflect the number of individuals residing in a district, fostering equality among communities regardless of their voting eligibility status. It recognizes the importance of including everyone in the population, such as children and non-citizens, in the redistricting process to ensure fair representation. Thus, this ruling reinforced the traditional method of districting based on total population, impacting how states draw their electoral maps and maintain balanced representation.